The Guardian - Is fair play in running more important than fairness to Caster Semenya as a human?
"Letting an athlete compete with too much of an inbuilt biological advantage feels unfair to their rivals; stopping someone competing as the woman she naturally is feels monumentally unfair to her. There is no way of resolving the moral dilemma without someone ending up wronged."
There is much to debate in terms of the ongoing controversy surrounding 800m Olympic champion Caster Semenya's high testosterone levels and apparent unfair advantage in her race category. Here is an opinion column that looks at the ethics behind the decision-making process, weighing the various perspectives (utilitarian, consequentialist, relativist, etc.) that are at the core of this RLS. Public opinion is quite divided, with many suggesting this is a gross injustice while others argue the ruling is necessary to preserve the integrity of the sport.

Comments
Post a Comment