Natural and human sciences: How objective are our scientific opinions?

I found this one on www.theoryofknowledge.net.  With direct links to the upcoming USA presidential election, the piece is described as follows:

"Social scientists investigate when and why liberals and conservatives mistrust science. The apparent split may be more about cultural and personal beliefs than feelings about science itself."

 How objective are our scientific opinions?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The NewYorker - THE POWER OF LOOKING, FROM EMMETT TILL TO PHILANDO CASTILE

In this piece,  Allyson Hobbs ( journalist and assistant history professor at Standford), explores her personal views on using graphic historical images in the classroom - " Early in my teaching career, I made a conscious choice not to include photographs of lynchings in my course materials...  My concern was that, if we merely looked at photographs of lynchings, we risked being complicit in those terrible acts, in their attempts to rob their victims not just of life but also of dignity, honor, and, above all, privacy. I worried that we couldn’t help but be voyeurs, observing spectacles rather than bearing witness to atrocities." Hobbs' article discusses how in two key US lynchings - the murder of 14-year old Emmett Till in 1955 and the recent murder of Philando Castile, whose death was captured on video and went viral - decisions were made to force people to "look" at what had happened.  Hobbs presents her realization that there is a definite emotional and ra...
Read more

PODCAST: Radiolab - Translation

" How close can words get you to the truth and feel and force of life? That's the question poking at our ribs this hour, as we wonder how it is that the right words can have the wrong meanings, and why sometimes the best translations lead us to an understanding that's way deeper than language. This episode, 8 stories that play out in the middle space between one reality and another — where poetry, insult comedy, 911 calls, and even our own bodies work to close the gap." Translation
Read more

Fake News Phenomenon - NYTimes article claims it depends on what you want to believe

NY Times explores the controversy surrounding the fake news phenomenon, both in terms of why it is so appealing to some, while so dangerous to others. "Fake news, and the proliferation of raw opinion that passes for news, is creating confusion,  punching holes in what is true, causing a kind of fun-house effect that leaves the reader doubting everything, including real news. That has pushed up the political temperature and increased polarization." In News, What's Fake and What's Real Can Depend on What You Want to Believe
Read more